Recently there’s been an amazing spate of really popularised history media. From the (hysterical!) Cunk on Britain, to Drunk History, and a full on rampage of Philippa Greggory spin offs.
There’s just one thing; none of the above count as history. Well so we’re told…
But I have a question. What makes those, so different to this:
Guys, I think the only difference might be that Horrible Histories is made for a children and the others are made for an adult audience. When you think about it, that’s kind of messed up…
Now, I love Horrible Histories, it was my gateway drug into history. As a child I spent hours in my local library in a fort made from every Horrible History on the shelf. And now another generation is still discovering how amazing history is through the funny, irreverent and yet oh so informative, Horrible History books, TV programme and plays. Isn’t that just the best?
So why the hell aren’t we allowing adults the same thing?
See, most adults don’t touch history after they leave school. And that’s not because they hate history, it’s because it stopped being fun and became boring.
For a really long time, history’s had a bit of a rep for being stuffy and elitist. Reserved only for those who wear tweed, have an AP accent and know what a Motte and Bailey is (side note- great name for a detective duo btw)
So for a lot of people, it can seem like if you’re not down for some hardcore documentary action on medieval literature, followed up by a 1000 page (not counting the footnotes) door-stopper on obscure Tudor royals, then history isn’t really here for you.
Now, if you work in or love history, you know thats not true. BUT, lets face facts, its a public image we’re going to have to fight to change.
So why then, when somebody comes along and tries to tackle this and make history super accessible and fun, we don’t jump for joy, but immediately pick it apart?
Now, full disclosure: I used to be a nitpicker
A while ago I worked in a Tudor Palace (natch) and pretty much every day I’d hear visitors excitedly talking about how being there was just like being in a real life episode of the Tudors or stepping into a Philippa Gregory book.
And whenever this happened I’d do the worlds biggest eye roll.
The Tudors? The Other Boleyn Girl? Pfffft, I mean come on, really; it’s dumbed down and totally inaccurate, not exactly ‘proper history’.
But then I realised: without The Other Boleyn Girl, or The Tudors, those people wouldn’t be there at all.
Just like Horrible Histories had been my gateway to history, this was theirs.
These weren’t frivolous bits of fluffs, they were helping people discover a love for history and a want to delve further into it; that’s AMAZING!
Oh, and you know what, when I actually checked out The Tudors and Philips Gregory for myself (because obvs I’d been judging without having tried them) I realised they were incredible pieces of historic entertainment.
See, just like we need magnificently researched academic papers, books and documentaries, we also need entertainment. Not just to help spark peoples historic imaginations, but also because what’s life without a little fun!
Oh, and for those who are screaming: But what about the historical accuracy, won’t someone think of the historical accuracy!?!
Have a little faith in peoples ability to understand the text in front of them.
When watching something like, Drunk History, people know to take things with a grain of salt, because it’s not a documentary.
So have no fear, nobody thinks Harriet Tubman actually said this:
So, next time you see a romping period drama, historical novel, hilarious history sketch show or *ahem* a slightly sweary history blog, don’t just overlook it at first glance.
And, if it’s not your cup of tea, thats totally fine, do you and enjoy the style of history that you enjoy. Just remember, history can be a lot of things to a lot of people, we just need to let people enjoy it.